Comments on: Now…Chancellor Woodson selection is news, good news on campus http://www.hiceschool.com/100-days-at-nc-state/now-chancellor-woodson-selection-is-news-good-news-on-campus/ Just another WordPress weblog Mon, 09 Jan 2012 16:55:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1 By: Joe Hice http://www.hiceschool.com/100-days-at-nc-state/now-chancellor-woodson-selection-is-news-good-news-on-campus/comment-page-1/#comment-168 Joe Hice Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:17:12 +0000 http://www.hiceschool.com/?p=1079#comment-168 John: We could debate the credibility thing, but I was glad to see people were so excited about the announcement. And it's all about transparency and an open, ongoing dialogue. John: We could debate the credibility thing, but I was glad to see people were so excited about the announcement. And it’s all about transparency and an open, ongoing dialogue.

]]> By: John Martin http://www.hiceschool.com/100-days-at-nc-state/now-chancellor-woodson-selection-is-news-good-news-on-campus/comment-page-1/#comment-166 John Martin Mon, 11 Jan 2010 20:06:27 +0000 http://www.hiceschool.com/?p=1079#comment-166 <i>In our excitement (the news reported in the paper was really, really good) a couple of us posted blog, Facebook and Twitter links to the newspaper story, but in doing so, we provided additional cred to the report…"<i> I don't agree that just pointing to something that's already published implies a credibility boost. Now if NC State people pointed to that article and added comments like, "I know this to be true," or "This IS going to happen..." then that's another thing. (I'm not privvy to the activity you saw.) To me, just the fact the NC State people were "up" on the conversation, and "into" the conversation, shows that we're keeping up with new communication technology and we care about what happens here. Thanks for initiating a dialog about this here. In our excitement (the news reported in the paper was really, really good) a couple of us posted blog, Facebook and Twitter links to the newspaper story, but in doing so, we provided additional cred to the report…”

I don’t agree that just pointing to something that’s already published implies a credibility boost. Now if NC State people pointed to that article and added comments like, “I know this to be true,” or “This IS going to happen…” then that’s another thing. (I’m not privvy to the activity you saw.)

To me, just the fact the NC State people were “up” on the conversation, and “into” the conversation, shows that we’re keeping up with new communication technology and we care about what happens here.

Thanks for initiating a dialog about this here.

]]>