| posted by Joe Hice |

Political Advertising — Bad for your brand

I’ve never been a fan of political season. The ads have taken over the airwaves and print waves and you just can’t escape.

From a marketing perspective, the season also presents challenges during an election year. Mid-November when things are cranking up for the Holidays would seem the perfect time to launch a new campaign or amplify an existing one.

But be warned, survey says Political Advertising can damage the message and the brand.  And because you can’t avoid it . . .

That leads me to a question though; what happens to a political ad that appears after a political ad?  Is Hillary’s message dismissed if it runs after Donald’s?  Is Donald’s obscured by Hillary?  If so, the campaign with the most advertising — the most money to spend — wins the ad effectiveness battle.

http://tinyurl.com/zaqj7et

screen-shot-2016-10-25-at-8-33-12-am

Reprinted from Ad Age:

When a brand ad runs after a political ad — even one with a positive message — it’s perceived as less effective and appealing, according to a study by J. Walter Thompson.

The online study, conducted in partnership with Forethought, looked at Survey Sampling International responses from 3,600 people ages 18 and older in September.

Twelve recent spots from presidential candidates Hillary Clinton and Donald Trump were used in the research. Half of the ads were “positive,” or did not denigrate either opponent, and the rest were “negative,” or attack ads. The brand ad used in the study was a 30-second Extra gum spot called “The Story of Sarah and Juan.”

One of the key findings from the survey was that political advertising, regardless of whether or not it is positive or negative, stimulates negative emotions from consumers.

Participants who viewed the brand ad after a political ad perceived the brand spot as 32% less relevant, 29% less entertaining and 27% less appealing, the study shows.

“What’s really interesting is that the negative response to the brand ad wasn’t limited to the ad itself; there was a negative response to the brand overall,” said Mark Truss, global director of brand intelligence at J. Walter Thompson.

Not only did Extra’s brand reputation drop 34% by survey participants who saw the spot following a positive or negative political ad from either candidate, the brand’s product value declined 32% and perceived product quality decreased 24%.

The research doesn’t yet reveal the length of time that political advertising’s negative “hangover effect” will last has on how people view subsequent ads, but Mr. Truss said it should get marketers thinking more about the context in which they place ads.

“Context really matters and it’s not all about size and classification of audiences, but the context in which one places their ads across digital, print and TV matters a great deal,” he added.

Ken Roberts, CEO of Forethought, said “emotion is everywhere,” so even though the study focused on political ads, the same negative emotion about brand advertising could be elicited by consumers after seeing upsetting news coverage.

One of Many

 

Passion Rules!

 

 

Share

Leave a Reply